"When asked why his father fights for an open society, Alex Soros replied that in a non-Jewish state, a Jew can only feel safe when other minorities are protected, which is one of the most important driving forces why his father has been active in his philanthropy."
Believing a group can only feel safe IF they are helping other groups is a perverted idea. It is a veiled threat to the safety of people who practice the following form of fundamental good:
Good defined: Families form as a heterosexual couple intent on having their own children (genetic offspring, not adoption). This family functions with a primary directive of their wealth being generated purely for the betterment of their own offspring, and for their future generations.
I've noticed the following groups largely practicing the above: East Asians, Jews, and Republicans.
I've noticed historic and contemporary groups hating this form of good. Nazi propaganda practically described Jews within my definition of good, and called it an evil worthy of extermination.
Contemporary Leftists confront this good from several fronts -heterosexuals with pure offspring are replaced with LGBTQ with adoptees as a wholesome norm. Then they battle on the economic side by taxes that extract wealth from good families and redistribute to other families and other children.
Returning to the definition of "good" stated above. The wider society is one in which everyone and every institution is support staff for the heterosexual capital hoarding family.
The definition of evil is any individual, agenda or institution that works against the heterosexual capital hoarding family.
Posts
