Republican scum kill the free market

Reference article for this blog post: McCain’s Radical Agenda

1. Good: Republicans are for a free market ( this does NOT have to mean pro-corporations, it DOES have to mean the market will kill off bad ideas, bad people, and bad products, and it DOES have to mean if a product is successfully being sold or method of trade is occurring, including barter or living solely on goats milk -is legit by its simply existing. )

2. Bad: The REPUBLICAN government is bailing out failed financial services giants.

1. Good: Republicans are for personal responsibility, innovation and initiative as the means of bettering one's living standard, and not the role of HIGH TAXES paying for bums, idiots, and worse to have things they don't deserve. Key here is the GOP almost always run on a LESS TAXES mantra.

2. Bad: The McCain-Palin Health Plan is to do an entirely new tax in the form of TAXING HEALTH BENEFITS AS IF IT IS INCOME, with the intention of poisoning the current employer-based health insurance scheme with negative social engineering.

The negative social engineering, combined with higher taxes, would make the McCain-Palin Health Plan a double crime from a purist free market perspective.

Its worth noting that Obama is the only voice of free market principles since these bailouts started happening. He is saying, too nicely for my taste, that these bailouts are the wrong signal to the economic system. He puts it in moralistic language sympathetic for the middle-class, which I think obscures the absolutely right stance he is taking. In a free market, one can make billions, or one can lose all of one's billions -the socialistic crime is government preventing either one.

The Republicans circa 2000-present are the worst failures in American history. Security from terrorism -failed; War- failed; Economy -failed. We'd do better electing a crack whore with a history of recurring head lice. At least we could run the country while she was passed out.

United States President: An Innovation

For an end to the culture war, and to move to a more collaborative and efficient union, America needs one of these scenarios for the Executive Branch:

Obama/Huckabee

Huckabee/Obama

Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger

Schwarzenegger/Bloomberg

I am an inner-city liberal that has no car, secular and geekish. My lifestyle would put me in the left-liberal camp under the old rules of the culture war. But I'm really tired of one side winning 4 years and shoving their collective lifestyle tenets down the throat of the other culture. All the guys in my list above are beyond such liberal-conservative war mongering. Defying old stereotypes -Huckabee is a former preacher that is also hip and witty, Obama is hip and also religious. Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger are Republicans that have championed progressive environmental policies, out of sync with many in their own party. They all know the collective economic muscle of this country relies on cities and countryside, religious people and geeks, hipsters and oldsters. To choose one or the other is to choose a weak country.

I select All the Above.